End The Fed, End The Nonsense Of Tyranny

Written by Michael W. Howell
Senior Writer and Editor at Fighting the Tyranny
Oct. 27, 2019

What is happening today in society is manufactured by an oligarchy. Let me say that one more time, and as you read the statement, let the words fully enter your collective conscience. What is happening today is being manufactured against us by a small oligarchy hellbent on global tyranny for mass profits. The sole purpose of the division is so that the ruling class elitists can transfer our wealth, in return, our individual sovereignty, over to the shadow government. Once this objective is accomplished, it is then on to conquer our national sovereignty through the game plan of divide and conquer.

Continue reading “End The Fed, End The Nonsense Of Tyranny”

The New Space Race Will Be Lead By A Space Force

Written by Michael W. Howell
Senior Writer and Editor at Fighting the Tyranny

What does a country with over 700 military bases in over 130 countries do next? What could possibly be the last remaining Superpower’s next move having already conquered global dominance through its military might? An expansion, of course. This time the threat is inter-galaxy. Or is it interstellar? I better brush up on my, what use to be considered as Sci-Fi talk, because it looks like I may need to know the lingo now with America, or Earth, getting a Space Force! Yes, a Space Force. Remember our reactions when Newt Gingrich talked about the need for a Mars exploration during a Presidential debate? Well, President Donald Trump’s announcement Monday wasn’t that of expanding space exploration, or even a new mission to hopefully uncover new technology. Nope, the silliness of this administration hit a new laughable level with his revealing of a new “Space Force.” Continue reading “The New Space Race Will Be Lead By A Space Force”

Slipping Out Of The Matrix No. 3

By Nichole Wilde
Senior Writer and Editor at Fighting the Tyranny

Fundamental to the discussion of escaping from what has been dubbed “The Matrix Reality,” is a strong understanding of right and wrong actions. An overwhelming amount of people asked will tell you that there is no objective right or wrong action; it all depends upon the intention of the person doing the activity. This is categorically false and is a philosophy that has underpinned the building of the false and inhumane Matrix Reality on top of our actual reality. The philosophy is formally called solipsism. Solipsism is a decaying force in civilized societies. Continue reading “Slipping Out Of The Matrix No. 3”

We Are In The Fourth Reich

Written by: Michael W. Howell
Senior Writer and Senior Editor at Fighting the Tyranny

You think the Third Reich was destroyed and conquered after World War II? Well, if wars are about ending an ideology to maintain person liberties and national sovereignty, then you couldn’t be farther from the truth. Sure we took out Hitler, supposedly, but his doctrine can be found on a global mass scale today. Even right here in the good ole U.S.A. I know what your thinking, but the truth pill is always a hard one to swallow.  It takes shaking off our cognitive dissonance and examining the facts before us. Continue reading “We Are In The Fourth Reich”

The Elite And Their Secret Societies

By Michael W. Howell
Staff Writer and Senior Editor at Fighting the Tyranny

“The very word secrecy is repugnant in a free and open society, and we are as a people inherently and historically opposed to secret societies, to secret oaths and secret proceedings. We decided long ago that the dangers of excessive and unwarranted concealment of pertinent facts far outweigh the risks which are cited to justify it.

“Even today, there is a little threat of opposing a secret society by imitating its arbitrary restrictions. Even today, there is little value in ensuring the future of our nation if our traditions do not survive with it, and there is great danger that an announced need for increased security will be seized upon by those anxious to expand its meaning to the very limits of official censorship and concealment – that I do not intend to allow to permit to the extent that it is in my control. Continue reading “The Elite And Their Secret Societies”

Welcome To The Truth

By Michael W. Howell
Staff Writer and Senior Editor at Fighting the Tyranny

You’re scratching your head wondering how this country got to where it is today, right? You just can’t fathom what led us here. You voted for the candidate that promised you everything you were looking for. You grew up patriotic. Your family is patriotic. You said the Pledge of Allegiance every morning in school and seemed to be surrounded by patriotic people, so what happened? Where and how did we deteriorate so fast and to such depths? Truth is we have been on this path for decades, no centuries. Yes, centuries. Don’t act like you haven’t heard this before. Continue reading “Welcome To The Truth”


Another tax season came and went. Some got refunds while others had to pay into the system. But did they really have to? No, I’m not talking about under threat. I’m talking about the legality of the tax system. You might be surprised to find that there is no law requiring you to pay taxes. Wait, don’t start yelling and screaming at me just yet. Before you do, I ask you this, have you ever seen a law that required you to pay taxes?  Have you physically seen the law, or are you just going by the old saying, “taxes and death.” I will bet dollars to donuts you can not recite one law that points to you being required to pay taxes. Continue reading “#OpTaxPenaltyDue”

American Politics: The Cloward-Pivens Way

Written by: Michael W. Howell
Senior Writer and Editor at Fighting the Tyranny

America is 18.5 trillion dollars in debt. Let me say that again. America is 18.5 trillion dollars in debt. How does a global superpower like America rack up over 18.5 trillion dollars in debt? Part of my question I answered myself when I said worldwide superpower and the other reason is by design. Yes, we are going bankrupt as a nation by design.

Financing an empire is expensive, and America is finding that out first hand. With a military presence that reaches globally with over 700 bases in over 130 countries that qualify as an empire. The Romans would have been jealous of this empire. It comes at, a cost though. This is not by far the only contributing factors to why America is so deep in debt. A growing welfare state (mostly corporate welfare), the exhaustive police state, high unemployment, blank checks given to Congress, and most damaging, the Cloward and Piven’s strategy are all to blame.

What is the Cloward and Piven strategy? In laymen’s terms, it is a plan to bring down America from within through collapsing the economy by putting such a strain on the marketplace that it can’t be sustainable. We clearly see that, but is it really happening, and how?

In 1966 the strategy, named after Columbia University sociologists Richard Andrew Cloward and Francis Fox Piven, was first proposed to overthrow capitalism by overloading the government bureaucracy with a flood of impossible demands, thus pushing society into crisis and economic collapse.

Coming off the August 1965 riots in the Watts district of Los Angeles, Cloward and Piven published an article titled “The Weight of the Poor: A Strategy to End Poverty” in the May 2, 1966 issue of The Nation. It was well-received as The Nation sold 30,000 reprints. The activist community was excited and wanted to put into practice the “crisis strategy” or “Cloward-Piven Strategy,” as it would be called.

In the article, Cloward and Piven stated that the ruling classes used welfare to attack and weaken the poor; that by providing a safety net, the rich doused the fires of rebellion. Cloward told The New York Times on September 27, 1970, that poor people can only advance when “the rest of society is afraid of them.” Rather than placating the poor with government hand-outs, wrote Cloward and Piven, activist should work to sabotage and destroy the welfare system; the collapse of the welfare state would ignite a political and financial crisis that would rock the nation; poor people would rise in revolt; only then would “the rest of society” accept their demands.

obama cloward and piven

It shouldn’t come as a surprise that early supporters of Cloward and Piven were also Saul Alinsky supporters. It seems like a strategy straight from Saul himself. “Make the enemy live up to their (sic) own book of rules,” Alinsky wrote in his 1971 book Rules for Radicals. When pressed to honor every word of every law and statute, every Judeo-Christian moral tenet, and every implicit promise of the liberal social contract, human agencies inevitably fall short. The system’s failure to “live up” to its rule book can then be used to discredit it altogether, and to replace the capitalist “rule book” with a socialist one.


The authors noted that the number of Americans subsisting on welfare — about 8 million, at the time — probably represented less than half the number who were technically eligible for full benefits. They proposed a “massive drive to recruit the poor onto the welfare rolls.”  Cloward and Piven calculated that persuading even a fraction of potential welfare recipients to demand their entitlements would bankrupt the system. The result, they predicted, would be “a profound financial and political crisis” that would unleash “powerful forces for major economic reform at the national level.”

Their article called for “cadres of aggressive organizers” to use “demonstrations to create a climate of militancy.” Browbeaten by threats of black violence, politicians would appeal to the federal government for help using bailouts. Detailed and crafted media campaigns, carried out by Operation Mockingbird, leftwing journalists, would circulate the idea of “a federal program of income redistribution,” in the form of a secure living income for all — working and non-working people alike. Local officials would gravitate at this idea, like drowning men to a lifeline. They would apply pressure on Washington to implement it. With every major city erupting into chaos, Washington would have to act. This was an example of what is commonly called Trojan Horse movements — mass movements whose outward purpose seems to be providing material help to the poor, but whose real objective is to draft poor people into service as revolutionary foot soldiers; to mobilize poor people en masse to overwhelm government agencies with a flood of demands beyond the capacity of those agencies to meet. The wave of demands was calculated to break the budget, jam the bureaucratic gears into gridlock, and bring the system crashing down. Fear, turmoil, violence, and economic collapse would accompany such a breakdown — providing perfect conditions for fostering radical change. That was the theory.

In 1967, after Cloward and Piven recruited a radical and militant black organizer named George Wiley, he founded the National Welfare Rights Organization (NWRO). Using tactics from Cloward and Piven, his followers invaded welfare offices across the United States. Many followers used violence and often bullied social workers and demanding every penny the law “entitled” them. Two years later, in 1969, the NWRO claimed a dues-paying membership of 22,500 families, with 523 chapters across the nation. The plan was in motion and gaining traction.

Regarding Wiley’s tactics, The New York Times commented on September 27, 1970, “There have been sit-ins in legislative chambers, including a United States Senate committee hearing, mass demonstrations of several thousand welfare recipients, school boycotts, picket lines, mounted police, tear gas, arrests – and, on occasion, rock-throwing smashed glass doors, overturned desks, scattered papers, and ripped-out phones.”These methods proved useful. “The flooding succeeded beyond Wiley’s wildest dreams,” writes Sol Stern in the City Journal. “From 1965 to 1974, the number of single-parent households on welfare soared from 4.3 million to 10.8 million, despite mostly flush economic times. By the early 1970s, one person was on the welfare rolls in New York City for every two that are working in the city’s private economy.” As a direct result of its massive welfare spending, New York City was forced to declare bankruptcy in 1975. The entire state of New York nearly went down with it. The Cloward-Piven strategy had proved its effectiveness.

We are seeing this today in once-booming and prosperous Detroit along with other major cities, which are placing a heavy burden on the city’s and even State’s infrastructure. It is leading to total dependency on the government. This is precisely the goal that the elite are using to bring in the world government that they have been planing. First, America has to be broke and broken. We are broke regarding our economic freedoms. However, we must never be broken, or the strategy will prevail, and the global bankers will win.

We see this election, the strategy being played out as far as self-proclaimed Democratic “Socialist,” Bernie Sanders campaign gaining momentum on platforms such as the black lives matter movement and his “free tuition for all” stance. This is a transparent tactic of divide and conquer and even a heavy burden on the nation’s economy. Methods like the BLM movement help to divide instead of uniting in the differences at hand. I think it needs to be all lives matter, and that way, real dialogue can take place, and real change will rise from the efforts. To keep us divided and at odds isn’t going to solve the problem, only look elsewhere for the solution. Where are many looking to? The government. The very same ones that are dividing us for the eventual conquer.

Bernie Sander’s plan of utopia and euphoria comes at a hefty cost, as well. Economist has placed his “plan” to add around 18 trillion dollars to the debt. Obama has added more debt than all the other presidents combined and brought the deficit to 18.5 trillion dollars, and now we are looking to add another 18 trillion to it? Insanity and irresponsible when logic and math are applied. Where would the extra revenue to fund this come from? Tax increases to which Bernie has already acknowledged we were in favor of.

We are also seeing the attack on the economy in the form of the open borders we now have. This was orchestrated and a ploy as well. Playing on the heartstrings of American’s goodwill and compassion, the elite are using “refugees” as a way to overburden the system and cause the artificial “crisis” that the strategy calls for.

A 2013 ICE document reveals the details and states that over 36,000 criminal illegal aliens were released from our government’s custody while awaiting the outcome of deportation proceedings in that year alone. That is not a refugee problem, but a planned action and is part of the Cloward-Piven plan in attacking the welfare system and economy.

cloward piven refugee

The plan to bring forth globalism through the divide and conquer method is taking shape and through many issues such as racism, conservative issues, socially, and even by religion, they are quickly transferring the problem they created to the solution the public will demand. Another way of defining the times is by getting to know the Hegelian dialectic. A tactic the Cloward-Piven supporters use and have become quite capable of. The Hegelian dialectic incorporates the “problem-action-solution” method that the elite love to use for the division.

They create the crisis, false flag event, or problem that they need to happen to later come in and offer the solution to the manufactured crisis they created. Basically, “control the chaos” mentality.

“You never want a serious crisis to go to waste.”

-Rahm Emanuel

In an attempt to call out this plan by name, Rudy Giuliani recognized the effort that the strategy was having when he said, “This wasn’t an accident, it wasn’t an atmospheric thing, it wasn’t supernatural. This is the result of policies and programs designed to have the maximum number of people get on welfare” in a 1997 speech.

It is no secret that our monetary system, set up and controlled by global offshore bankers through the Federal Reserve, is fictitious and fraudulent. The Federal Reserve uses its power and control over the economy, and by controlling the politics of America cannot only manipulate the economy but for global policies that perpetuate the division. And by setting the interest rates, the Fed can offer the solution and appear to be the answer, even though they create the problem.

By controlling the monetary system, the Federal Reserve is then able to control countries through debt. To keep the full agenda steam ahead, they not only start the illegal wars our brothers and sisters fight in but also fund both sides.

“Give me control of a nation’s money and I care not who makes it’s laws”

-Mayer Amshel Bauer Rothschild

There are many tentacles at play in the times we are in, but it is essential to know they are all calculated, methodical, planned, and not by mistake. There is a goal or agenda at play, and the more we stay divided, the harder it will be to make a stand against the real enemy. We can defeat the Cloward-Piven strategy once we all recognize the plan and coordinate our efforts collectively.


You can pick up a copy of Anatomy of the Global Agenda from Amazon and everywhere books are sold.

Follow Fighting the Tyranny on Facebook for more articles and news

Please be sure to check out the Fighting the Tyranny Blog for more articles.





Conspiracy Theorist. A Badge I Wear With Honor

Of all the names I have been called, and there have been many, conspiracy theorist is one I have come to embrace. Once I jumped down the rabbit hole and became aware of the issues facing us today I started to hear that term more and more. I didn’t understand why I was being called this name when I wasn’t using theories, but rather facts. Quickly I found that this was a way for the elite and globalist to try to discredit us and make us look paranoid or just flat out crazy. I remember the day vividly when I said to myself, “OK globalist, I accept your challenge.” Every since that moment I have welcomed the challenge to put my research to the test. Like I predicted, the research has stood up to time, criticism, attacks, and a wave of emotion that would have brought some down. I remained sturdy and true in the research.

Before we go any farther let’s define the term conspiracy theorist. If we break down the two words we can easily see that the term has no legitimate place among the truth tellers and liberty movement. Take the first word, conspiracy. By definition conspiracy is when more than one person conspire to do something. We can all agree that not one person, but many are in control of the decisions that are taking us deeper into tyranny. Therefore, we have a conspiracy. The second word in the term is theorist. When I am discussing anything about globalism, New World Order, or any issue I use facts, not theories. Often times I use their own words, writings, and objectives. That hardly makes me a theorist.

The term conspiracy theorist was coined by the C.I.A. after the John F. Kennedy assassination as an attempt to diminish the outcry from the public that the Kennedy assassination was an inside job. For many years, really up to the past couple years, the C.I.A. was successful in their attempt. We are now seeing a mass awakening thanks to horrible foreign policy, endless wars, a fiat monetary system, and other “conspiracy theories” that have all been proven true. The “in crowd” is slowly, but surely, joining the conspiracy theorist.

So what constitutes being called a conspiracy theorist. Well I do not have time to go over all of them, but some topics that will get you called conspiracy theorist is wanting to end the Federal Reserve because of their fictitious hold they have over nations. Along with funding both sides of every war, they set policies and control nation’s economies through a hidden tax called artificial inflation. Not open to any audit or congressional oversight, the Federal Reserve, or the Fed, has complete reign over wars, economies, policies, and control our politicians like puppets. Yes, even and especially the Presidency.

Undeclared wars is another topic that brings out the haters of truth and liberty. Just the mention of not supporting these undeclared wars brings out some nasty vibes in people. They act like we are to just blindly support the troops regardless of what they are told to do. Let’s remember they voluntarily swore an oath to defend the Constitution against enemies foreign or domestic. Yet, we are seeing them breach their oath at the beacon call of a corrupt and agenda driven government.

We are seeing countries go after Monsanto and other companies that produce G.M.O. foods and in America we are called conspiracy theorist even though the ones calling us the names does not even know what Monsanto is, let alone what they are doing to the food supply. Demanding a simple act like labeling our food gets us heckled and ridiculed. If one would just take a brief moment to research Monsanto and all the legal actions taken against them then they would quickly join our side. Instead it is easier to just use that term – conspiracy theorist.

One that I am finding out to be a controversial topic is chemtrails. The ignorance or acceptance that this is a fact is overwhelming. Chemtrail pilots have come out and exposed the program. Governments have acknowledged cloud seeding, H.A.A.R.P. program, and other evidence surrounding the program, but the masses still refuse to grasp what chemtrails are all about. Next time you go outside, look up. Theory will move over to facts and the denial will be out of ignorance, not facts.

And let’s touch on the mother load of all conspiracies. The elephant in the room that no one wants to talk about head on – 9/11. How two planes could knock down three buildings, defying all science, physics, engineering, architectural accomplishments, and just flat out common sense is beyond me. With little research one can come to the conclusion that the official report and the investigation that led to the official report is at best an elaborate piece of science fiction. When building 7 enters the equation it is hard to accept the lies that led to war(s) and a lost of freedoms and liberties we have seen since 9/11.

Acting on emotion instead of rational thinking and a conclusive and independent investigation, we started a war with Iraq and Afghanistan. Both countries our own government acknowledges had nothing to do with the events of that day. Did Americans question our involvement in these wars since they had nothing to do with the 9/11 plot? Nope. They just screamed from the top of their lungs to go to war and to put a “boot up their ass” as one country artist proudly sang. The chants of “turn the sand into glass”, “kill ’em all”, and other ignorant statements based solely on fear and not resolve were at the peak during the aftermath of 9/11. Questions like, “why was the steel (evidence) immediately sold off to china”, or “how does a skyscraper like building 7 fall without being hit by an airplane”, or even a discussion about how the twin towers were designed to withstand multiple hits from aircraft were not in the forefront of the discussion. In fact, if you were to bring these questions up you were instantly labeled and no thought given to the questions being asked.

So having said all of this I gladly accept the label. Call me what you will, I will stand by the facts and research. One thing I do ask of you is that before you use that term ask yourself how much time and resources you have on the subject. Chances are that the person you are about to call a conspiracy theorist has hundreds of hours of research on the subjects. Globalist, elitist, banker scum, dirty politicians, and naysayers, checkmate.


Written by: Michael Howell


Please be sure to check out the Fighting the Tyranny blog site for more articles





What Is A False Flag

Written by: Michael W. Howell
Senior Writer and Editor at Fighting the Tyranny

This is a growing phrase we keep hearing in today’s times, but what does it mean? What do you think of when you hear the term false flag? Gulf of Tonkin? Operation Northwoods? Boston Bombing? What about Sandy Hook? Maybe you think of the mother of all false flags, 9/11? Many of us think of all of these plus many more. There is little to no doubt that there is a global agenda shaping the world today, and the globalists are using the tactic of fear, through false flags, to rapidly and effectively achieve the goals they set forth.

Just how they use these false flags is elementary, but has many surrendering their rights and liberties that generations have died for to preserve at a record pace. It is through our fear and complacency that the false flags are winning, and democracies are losing. We are told that the current situation we are facing with global terrorism is because they hate us for our freedoms and our way of life. The fact that we are giving up our freedoms for safety and changing our way of life to combat terrorism really should equate to a win for the terrorist, but we are told that the steps are necessary. I have to ask the question, “are these steps necessary?”

Take the tragedy that happened on 9/11 when we lost so much life and liberties. The lives lost in New York, at the Pentagon, and Pennsylvania brought forth policies such as the Patriot Act and expanded the spying program of the N.S.A. to include monitoring and cataloging the phone records, emails, and even social media post of innocent civilians without a warrant or probable cause. The fourth amendment nullified, in essence, resulting in both a loss of rights and a change in our day to day lives. According to what we were told about the War on Terrorism, it seems like a win for the enemy.

What makes a false flag just that is the evidence. Let me pause for a minute and clear up the air about what precisely a false flag by definition is. A false flag is typically defined, in conventional terms, as an act of terror committed under a false flag or group to achieve political or military gain. It seems like with the attacks we have seen in recent decades, and even before, both political and military gain has been accomplished.

On September the 11th, 2001, as the nation was gasping for air and understanding, the agenda was already being forged in the media, political speeches, and through the scared voice of Americans. In the instance, we were clamoring for answers and trying to make sense of what we just witnessed. Cries for war were being heard, and Washington was already planning for that.

Among the many signs that 9/11 was a false flag, I want to touch on the events that transpired after the attacks. Of course, the evidence of any attack can conclude if it was a false flag, but the actions in the aftermath all but seal the deal. It seems like they always have the solution in the wings just waiting to be executed right after the events.

On the very same day as the attacks on the twin towers, actually just a mere hours later, we already had a suspect with very detailed facts – Osama Bin Laden. We had the media scrambling to the story reporting on anything and everywhere. We had President Bush calling for “those responsible” to be hearing from us, and soon as it would turn out. Hollywood was in full effect writing songs about putting a “boot in your ass,” and the American people couldn’t get enough of the rhetoric.

By slowing down and asking questions, we could have very quickly pointed out all the anomalies of that day that would have led to a much needed independent investigation instead of a needless war with a high amount of “collateral damage” as stated by Madeleine Albright in a televised national interview. But that wasn’t the endgame, toppling Saddam was the goal. War is big business, and this was a prime scenario for the Military-Industrial Complex to use their new toys in real-world situations and for Halliburton to cash in handsomely.

Air travel was halted to Americans, and checkpoints were in high demand. Fear was elevated to a level we haven’t seen before and haven’t seen since that time. And the lost of liberties was not only welcomed but demanded by the public. Under a falsehood of security, the government was eager to oblige. The media helped to perpetuate this agenda through adverse reporting that involved little to no investigative journalism. It was a script being told by characters involved in the narrative. Many didn’t even realize or care that they were being used.

Now with the public on board to keep the homeland safe, President George W. Bush signed into law the controversial legislation known as the Patriot Act. He didn’t stop there. We got a new leg of government, more like a strong arm, called The Department of Homeland Security that compounded the controversy and receive much attention from free thinkers as needless expenditure of taxpayer money and a massive overreach in our lives. Publicly hire security in airports was quickly replaced with government-paid security, and the birth of the T.S.A. was born. We indeed saw a change in the way we conduct our business and live our lives.

Military vehicles and personnel were in transit to Iraq, and Saddam was on the move. Though publicly, his Minister of Propaganda was portraying a different view. And once again, the American people were yelling for war. But why were the calls for war against Saddam, and more importantly, the people of Iraq, even an option? We were just told that Osama Bin Laden was responsible for the attacks, and now we are going after Saddam?

Colin Powell went before the United Nations and laid out the Government’s case for such a war. With confidence, the former General showed us pictures of trucks design to carry and house weapons of mass destruction. With a sharp presentation and little room for error, he made it clear that Iraq was not only holding these weapons but ready and willing to use them. Stories from other witnesses and collaborators backed up his story, and the narrative for war was made.

The goal for the false flag was achieved. Saddam Hussein would be removed, the Iraqi’s resources would be stolen, and The Federal Reserve would get to move into Iraq. From the viewpoint of the elite, this was a victory. Through our lack of questioning and naivety, we got a never-ending war on terrorism and the bleeding of rights and liberties.

9/11 was an example of how a military goal can be achieved through false flags, but let’s not forget political agendas, too, are a cause for false flags. This was never more evident than Sandy Hook. Or Sandy Hoax as I like to refer to it as. The evidence here, just like 9/11, is so overwhelming that it can’t be ignored.

One clear piece of evidence that an event was a false flag is the fact that a “drill” of some sort was taking place at the same time, regarding the same kind of event as the said supposed real event. As the government was running terror drills on 9/11 simulating the very same type of attacks that ended up happening in New York, we find that in Sandy Hook’s case, they were also participating in drills. Why would a school participate in such an exercise, and why use the media in this? Nothing makes something look and feel really like those participating in something under one pretense and calling on the media to spread it like wildfire.

Just years earlier, Eric Holder made a statement that resonates loudly today, and that is the infamous statement he made regarding firearms. “We need to brainwash people into looking at guns in a vastly different way.” Sandy Hook would end up being that brainwashing Obama, and his minions would need and use.

Though Obama ran his campaign in 2008 saying he wasn’t coming after our guns, everyone knew his stance on firearms was weak, to say the least. In typical Democrat fashion, he put on a show to pander votes while secretly plotting his plans to eliminate or significantly reduce the number of firearms Americans would have. Coming from Chicago, he should know the value of gun ownership since Chicago has the strictest gun laws, but the highest gun violence in the nation.

Newtown, Connecticut, the home town of Sandy Hook School, was by all accounts a sleepy town. Charming, affluent, but albeit not much in the way of politics, making it the perfect backdrop for the upcoming false flag. Like I did in the above part of this article with 9/11, I want to focus on the aftermath that came after the “event.”

With the crisis actors memorizing their lines, the media ready to plaster the narratives all over the waiting public, the story begins to unfold. Adam Lanza, a loner and virtually unknown to people in the area, killed his mother and then proceeded to make his way to Sandy Hook School, where he would carry out the mass murder of over 20 kids and a teacher. The details are vague and often misreported when it comes to this story, which is a clear sign of a false flag. The story changes or is flat out rewritten at any given time. Right on queue here comes President Obama and the disarming agenda.

All the familiar statements were uttered and then uttered again in stereo and on loop. “We need to rethink our gun laws to prevent this from happening again.” “It’s such a tragedy that we have guns in modern times.” “If it saves just one child, then we need to rethink gun control.” It wasn’t a gun that did these things, but the acts of an individual person. If the story of Adam’s life were right, which it is not, then even if guns weren’t around, he would have acted out in violence. Another clear sign of a false flag is when the attention is taken off of the act and placed on the agenda as it was in this case.

We saw the President take to the airwaves on television, radio, correspondence dinners, and any event he could use to push the gun control agenda. In many circles and ways, he succeeded. He was not alone in his quest. Picking up the cause and releasing outlandish statements was Senator Dianne Feinstein when she tried to convince us that when the bad guy saw that no one else had guns, then he too would lay down his. What? That is beyond foolish and makes no logical sense at all. Did the Aurora shooter lay down his? The Ft. Hood shooter? And what about all those homicide deaths in Chicago? Did they lay down their guns when they noticed their victims had none? Asinine and irresponsible remarks from someone we should have higher expectations from.

So the gun debate picked up steam, and Sandy Hook was the new role model for the attempt to demean gun owners and the fundamental right of self-protection. Many rallied around their Representatives that called for stricter gun laws while others gathered around the N.R.A. and other gun rights groups. Social media was buzzing with heated debates, and all views were expressed at length. Laws were passed limiting magazine capacity, particular ammo was under the microscope, and any attempt to make it harder to be a legal gun owner was used.

False flags are not new and will continue to be used against us in this all-out attempt at our individual sovereignty. It is as old as power itself, and no sign of let-up is on the horizon. From the Gulf of Tonkin to get us into the Vietnam war to cyber attacks to give up our internet freedom, the false flag card will be played. We must investigate all events and think through to the conclusion using logic and reason when we are faced with circumstances that seem odd or illogical. You better believe there is an agenda behind the act, and it never includes securing our liberties, but in taking them altogether.

The Constitutional Republic is only as free as the rights it retains, not surrenders, under any circumstance. We need to head off those that come after our God-given, natural rights and preserve those freedoms not only for us but for future generations. Through a naive mentality, we have accepted false flags such as U.S.S. Liberty, the Boston Bombing, the Aurora cinema shooting, Operation Northwoods, and many others. It is time to wipe the golden slumbers from our eyes and be the resistance we need to be in this ever-growing fight. Too much is at stake with too much to lose. Fight these with logical researched facts and clear thoughts. When you have all the facts it is hard to be persuaded into the false flag narrative.



Please check out some of my other articles

New World Order and the Luciferian Agenda

Do Corporations Run A Sovereign Country

Terrorism, The Federal Reserve, and the Global Agenda

Our Biggest Threat Is Cognitive Dissonance

Is The Constitution Still Valid





Powered by WordPress.com.

Up ↑

%d bloggers like this: