By Michael W. Howell
Staff Writer and Senior Editor at Fighting the Tyranny
Very few have noticed and sadly very few even care, but the Republican party changed their logo in the year 2000 just as George W. Bush was entering the office. It is very subtle, however, very significant. The logo of the G.O.P. has always been an elephant with three stars in a row at the top. While the elephant, stars, and even the colors are still present one change has been done. The top of the star now points downward instead of upwards causing many to question the change. It represents a pentagram now which is strange considering the party claims Christian values and traditions. In fact, the last statistics I have seen, the evangelical voters tend to be Republicans. Odd that the logo now represents anything but Christian values.
I, myself, am not a Republican, nor Democrat, but have always wondered why the change? I noticed it a few years ago, wondered about it, researched it, and then, like many, moved on. However, with this being another election cycle I can’t help but revisit my original thought process of years ago and wonder why would a party, any party, make such a blatant change? Am I suggesting the party is in line with Satan? No, but they are using a symbol that is commonly associated with those that are.
“A reversed pentagram, with two points projecting upwards, is a symbol of evil and attracts sinister forces because it overturns the proper order of things and demonstrates the triumph of matter over spirit. It is the goat of lust attacking the heavens with its horns, a sign execrated by initiates.”
“The flaming star, which, when turned upside down, is the hieroglyphic sign of the goat of Black Magic, whose head may be drawn in the star, the two horns at the top, the ears to the right and left, the beard at the bottom. It is the sign of antagonism and fatality. It is the goat of lust attacking the heavens with its horns.”
The timing of the change is somewhat odd as well. It was at a time when we were having two candidates with connections to the secret society group, Skull and Bones, vying for the Presidency. Skull and Bones, the “fraternity on Yale University’s campus have been linked on many occasions to Satanism or the occult. The election was very close with John Kerry winning the popular vote, but Bush taking the White House on a contested vote count that came down to Florida. Everyone remembers the “hanging chad” show.
Here we are 16 years past the change to the parties logo and no explanation has been given and no mainstream media attention given to the obvious change. I heard one theory about how it was an accident from a graphic artist. I think it is clear to say that 16 years later that theory can be debunked. If it was just a graphic design problem it wouldn’t be used to this day. But it is.
The Republican Party is not the only ones that have had this issue though. In 2008 a picture of Hillary Clinton campaigning at a New Hampshire primary showed an American flag with all the stars on the flag pointing down. Are we seeing a transition in our political system giving allegiance to someone, or something else? With the number of freedoms and liberties lost in the past 16 years, and at the rapid rate of tyranny we are experiencing, it is very possible, if not a given fact.
I will continue to research and try to find a reason the party changed the logo. Sure seems if it was harmless or no big deal, then after 16 years some explanation or reason would have sprung forward by now. Is this a New World Order move, bad graphic designer, or something more? I would say only time will tell, but it clearly isn’t in a hurry to reveal itself so far.
Presidential Candidate Donald Trump spoke at AIPAC today and tried to reiterate his support for Israel. Some of his comments have come under attack from members of the Jewish community. Many have expressed dis concern over his remark about banning all Muslims from entering the country. Trump tried to use this time to talk about many issues including the Iran nuclear deal and even touched on the United Nations when he said that “the United Nations is not a friend of Democracy.”
Below is a full transcript of his speech at AIPAC.
“Good evening. I speak to you today as a lifelong supporter and true friend of Israel. I am a newcomer to politics but not to backing the Jewish state.
In late 2001, weeks after the attacks on New York City and Washington – attacks perpetrated by Islamic fundamentalists, Mayor Giuliani visited Israel to show solidarity with terror victims. I sent him in my plane because I backed the mission 100%.
In Spring 2004, at the height of violence in the Gaza Strip, I was the Grand Marshal of the 40th Salute to Israel Parade, the largest single gathering in support of the Jewish state.
It was a very dangerous time for Israel and frankly for anyone supporting Israel – many people turned down this honor –I did not, I took the risk.
I didn’t come here tonight to pander to you about Israel. That’s what politicians do: all talk, no action. I came here to speak to you about where I stand on the future of American relations with our strategic ally, our unbreakable friendship, and our cultural brother, the only democracy in the Middle East, the State of Israel.
My number one priority is to dismantle the disastrous deal with Iran. I have been in business a long time. I know deal-making and let me tell you, this deal is catastrophic – for America, for Israel, and for the whole Middle East.
The problem here is fundamental. We have rewarded the world’s leading state sponsor of terror with $150 billion and we received absolutely nothing in return.
I’ve studied this issue in greater detail than almost anybody. The biggest concern with the deal is not necessarily that Iran is going to violate it, although it already has, the bigger problem is that they can keep the terms and still get to the bomb by simply running out the clock, and, of course, they keep the billions.
The deal doesn’t even require Iran to dismantle its military nuclear capability! Yes, it places limits on its military nuclear program for only a certain number of years. But when those restrictions expire, Iran will have an industrial-size military nuclear capability ready to go, and with zero provision for delay no matter how bad Iran’s behavior is. When I am president, I will adopt a strategy that focuses on three things when it comes to Iran.
First, we will stand up to Iran’s aggressive push to destabilize and dominate the region. Iran is a very big problem and will continue to be, but if I’m elected President, I know how to deal with trouble. Iran is a problem in Iraq, a problem in Syria, a problem in Lebanon, a problem in Yemen, and will be a very major problem for Saudi Arabia. Literally every day, Iran provides more and better weapons to their puppet states.
Hezbollah in Lebanon has received sophisticated anti-ship weapons, anti-aircraft weapons, and GPS systems on rockets. Now they’re in Syria trying to establish another front against Israel from the Syrian side of the Golan Heights.
In Gaza, Iran is supporting Hamas and Islamic Jihad – and in the West Bank they are openly offering Palestinians $7,000 per terror attack and $30,000 for every Palestinian terrorist’s home that’s been destroyed.
Iran is financing military forces throughout the Middle East and it is absolutely indefensible that we handed them over $150 billion to facilitate even more acts of terror.
Secondly, we will totally dismantle Iran’s global terror network. Iran has seeded terror groups all over the world. During the last five years, Iran has perpetrated terror attacks in 25 different countries on five continents. They’ve got terror cells everywhere, including in the western hemisphere very close to home. Iran is the biggest sponsor of terrorism around the world and we will work to dismantle that reach.
Third, at the very least, we must hold Iran accountable by restructuring the terms of the previous deal. Iran has already – since the deal is in place – test-fired ballistic missiles three times. Those ballistic missiles, with a range of 1,250 miles, were designed to intimidate not only Israel, which is only 600 miles away but also intended to frighten Europe, and, someday, the United States.
Do you want to hear something really shocking? As many of the great people in this room know, painted on those missiles – in both Hebrew and Farsi – were the words “Israel must be wiped off the face of the earth.”
What kind of demented minds write that in Hebrew? And here’s another twisted part – testing these missiles does not even violate the horrible deal that we made!
The deal is silent on test missiles but those tests DO violate UN Security Council Resolutions. The problem is, no one has done anything about it. Which brings me to my next point – the utter weakness and incompetence of the United Nations.
The United Nations is not a friend of democracy. It’s not a friend to freedom. It’s not a friend even to the United States of America, where as all know, it has its home. And it surely isn’t a friend to Israel.
With President Obama in his final year, discussions have been swirling about an attempt to bring a security council resolution on the terms of an eventual agreement between Israel and Palestine. Let me be clear: An agreement imposed by the UN would be a total and complete disaster. The United States must oppose this resolution and use the power of our veto. Why? Because that’s not how you make a deal.
Deals are made when parties come to the table and negotiate. Each side must give up something it values in exchange for something it requires. A deal that imposes conditions on Israel and the Palestinian Authority will do nothing to bring peace. It will only further delegitimize Israel and it would reward Palestinian terrorism, because every day they are stabbing Israelis – and even Americans.
Just last week, American Taylor Allen Force, a West Point grad who served in Iraq and Afghanistan, was murdered in the street by a knife-wielding Palestinian. You don’t reward that behavior, you confront it!
It’s not up the United Nations to impose a solution. The parties must negotiate a resolution themselves. The United States can be useful as a facilitator of negotiations, but no one should be telling Israel it must abide by some agreement made by others thousands of miles away that don’t even really know what’s happening.
When I’m president, believe me, I will veto any attempt by the UN to impose its will on the Jewish state. You see, I know about deal-making – that’s what I do. I wrote The Art of the Deal, one of the all-time best-selling books about deals and deal making. To make a great deal, you need two willing participants.
We know Israel is willing to deal. Israel has been trying to sit down at the negotiating table, without pre-conditions, for years. You had Camp David in 2000, where Prime Minister Barak made an incredible offer – maybe even too generous. Arafat rejected it.
In 2008, Prime Minister Olmert made an equally generous offer. The Palestinian Authority rejected it. Then John Kerry tried to come up with a framework and Abbas didn’t even respond, not even to the Secretary of State of the United States of America!
When I become President, the days of treating Israel like a second-class citizen will end on Day One. I will meet with Prime Minister Netanyahu immediately. I have known him for many years and we will be able to work closely together to help bring stability and peace to Israel and to the entire region.
Meanwhile, every single day, you have rampant incitement and children being taught to hate Israel and hate the Jews. When you live in a society where the firefighters are the hero’s little kids want to be firefighters.
When you live in a society where athletes and movie stars are heroes, little kids want to be athletes and movie stars. In Palestinian society, the heroes are those who murder Jews – we can’t let this continue. You cannot achieve peace if terrorists are treated as martyrs. Glorifying terrorists is a tremendous barrier to peace.
In Palestinian textbooks and mosques, you’ve got a culture of hatred that has been fermenting there for years, and if we want to achieve peace, they’ve got to end this indoctrination of hatred. There is no moral equivalency. Israel does not name public squares after terrorists. Israel does not pay its children to stab random Palestinians.
You see, what President Obama gets wrong about deal making is that he constantly applies pressure to our friends and rewards our enemies. That pattern, practiced by the President and his administration, including former Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton, has repeated itself over and over and has done nothing but embolden those who hate America. We saw that with releasing $150 billion to Iran in the hope that they would magically join the world community – It’s the same with Israel and Palestine.
President Obama thinks that applying pressure to Israel will force the issue, but it’s precisely the opposite. Already, half the population of Palestine has been taken over by the Palestinian ISIS in Hamas, and the other half refuses to confront the first half, so it’s a very difficult situation but when the United States stands with Israel, the chances of peace actually rise. That’s what will happen when I’m president.
We will move the American embassy to the eternal capital of the Jewish people, Jerusalem – and we will send a clear signal that there is no daylight between America and our most reliable ally, the state of Israel.
The Palestinians must come to the table knowing that the bond between the United States and Israel is unbreakable. They must come to the table willing and able to stop the terror being committed on a daily basis against Israel and they must come to the table willing to accept that Israel is a Jewish State and it will forever exist as a Jewish State.
Thank you very much, its been a great honor to be with you.”
Debate after debate or political ad after political ad, one thing is for sure. The Republican party needs help and it needs it fast. It is not looking very presidential on the right side right now. The good thing is that those on the left waiting in the wings to take on the Republican nominee in the race to the White House are just as bad. Hillary, who is being investigated for possible national security violations over the whole email scandal or the socialist Bernie Sanders are equally as bad as far as dangers to the Republic go.
Now that the Republican field has been trimmed down with the campaign suspensions from Rand Paul, Chris Christie, Carly Fiorina, Jeb Bush and likely coming announcement from the Ben Carson camp no one, with the exception of Donald Trump, seems to have a real grassroots-based support. This applied to the Rand Paul supporters when he was still in the race as well. What I mean is Donald Trump’s fan base has been strong from the beginning. He has added many supporters along the way but has consistently maintained as strong and energetic fan base.
With the other candidates throughout the race it was a “flavor of the week” type of support. Each candidate went through their “time” in the race and fizzled out. At one time the “person that could beat Trump” was Ben Carson. He had a nice couple weeks rising in the polls, however, quickly lost flavor with the voters.
Jeb Bush, though his campaign never really equaled a “Bush-style” campaign, did have moderate rises in the polls, but was no match for Donald Trump in debates or head-to-head. He spent more in political television ads than the rest combined only to bow out. I thought he would have the longevity through resources and especially the name, Bush, to stave off a long campaign. He just couldn’t reach a nation that is weary and tired of Bush’s in the white house.
Now with Ben Carson on the ropes in this political fight he has announced today that he, too, is suspending his campaign. The one time contender to the front runner Donald Trump lost a wave of momentum he had early on in the race. An outsider to politics he used that as far as it would take him, but eventually his weakness on foreign policy couldn’t resonate with the voters. His soft speech and calm demeanor has made some question if he was tough enough for the office. We will see if he has a place on the elected presidents staff.
Chris Christie who hovered low in the poll numbers had very little growth in his campaign. Never forgetting to play the 9/11 card at a moments notice the party couldn’t find their candidate with him. Shortly after dropping out of the race he threw his support around his one time adversary, Donald Trump.
Senator Cruz and Senator Rubio are experiencing a moment of the “flavor of the week” among the voters as well, as the establishment of the party are scrambling to find an answer to Donald Trump’s staying power and popularity. Ted Cruz had a decent showing on super Tuesday winning Alaska, Oklahoma, and Texas, but super Tuesday, like the debates and race so far, belonged to Trump. Marco Rubio barely made the scorecard with one state win on super Tuesday. Minnesota came out and supported The Rubio camp and he was able to win there.
The front runner Donald Trump just keeps steaming along and enjoyed winning seven states. Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Massachusetts, Tennessee, Vermont, and Virginia were all clear victories for Trump and also helped add to his delegate lead which brought the total to 329. Ted Cruz follows behind at 231 and Rubio rounds out the top three with 110 delegates.
The Democratic race to the delegates is more lopsided with Hillary Clinton having 1,058 delegates to Bernie Sander’s 431 delegates. Barring some unforeseen event like an indictment, Hillary will be the Democratic party’s nominee.
The republican higher ups are not happy with this Trump wave of support and have even come out with some harsh words to what a Trump nominee would do to the party. The Republican establishment’s “golden boy” Mitt Romney has been one of the loudest to voice his opinions.
“…do everything within the normal political bounds to make sure we don’t nominate Donald Trump.”
-Mitt Romney on NBC Today Show
Recently while speaking Mitt Romney went on to talk about Trump’s foreign policy, his businesses, his plan for the economy and attacking his temperament.
Look, his bankruptcies have crushed small businesses and the men and women who work for them. He inherited his business, he didn’t create it. And whatever happened to Trump Airlines? How about Trump University? And then there’s Trump Magazine and Trump Vodka and Trump Steaks and Trump Mortgage. A business genius he is not.
Why is the establishment Rino’s rolling out 2012 failed candidate Mitt Romney now? Donald Trump is leading a race in the voters eyes and is causing the G.O.P. higher epsilon to make moves to swing the base back to the establishment’s choice. Either Cruz or Rubio would make the elite happy, but not a Trump Nominee.
Donald Trump has been hit from every angle and still seems to not only stand his ground, but come out with more support than before. Take for instance some of his comments he has made.
“I could stand in the middle of Fifth Avenue and shoot somebody and I wouldn’t lose any voters.”
I have seen the passion in his fan base and I am almost certain this is a true statement. He has an energetic fan base and they are liking what he is saying. At every possible moment his opponents like to point to his supporters as angry, racist, and Islamophobic. No doubt he has a controversial stance on both Muslims and border control, but it is in line with the majority of the Republican voters.
With a front runner that the establishment don’t want and the large amount of Republican voters that do want, this will be an interesting watch in the months to come and at the convention.